Everyone in CA needs to help defeat Prop 29 or Cigar prices will rise real fast! Here is an update:
The June 5th election is just over a month away and the campaign has kicked into high gear. We recently released ads that you may have seen or heard if not, you can watch and listen to them here.
Now, more than ever, we need your help spreading our message throughout California. Here are few ways
you can help:
Stay Informed. Read the recent editorials by the Los Angeles Times, Orange County Register and The Press-Enterprise on why they all oppose Prop. 29.
Engage Online. By posting on Facebook and Twitter, you can communicate quickly and easily with your friends, family, colleagues and members why Prop. 29 is wrong for California.
Stay Informed
Read the editorial by the Los Angeles Times Recommending No on 29
Read the Orange County Register editorial against Prop. 29 here
The Press-Enterprise editorial board came to the conclusion that Californians should vote No on 29
Sample Facebook/Twitter Posts
Twitter
#Prop29 is 4,515 words of fine print, loopholes & flaws. readforyourself.org
OC Register says NO to #Prop29! Make sure you vote NO on Prop. 29 this June 5! http://shar.es/2pk8U
In case you missed it: @OCReggie says Prop. 29 a bad way to fund a good cause #NoProp29 http://shar.es/2pk8U
The Orange County Register's Editorial Board unequivocally opposes Prop. 29. #NoProp29 http://shar.es/2pk8U
The @LATimes goes No on #Prop29 !! Funding priorities shouldnt be set at the ballot box http://lat.ms/I5X3nc
From @LATimes EdBoard: We recommend a No vote on Proposition 29. http://lat.ms/I5X3nc
Says @LATimes #Prop29 well intentioned but doesnt make sense. http://lat.ms/I5X3nc and #Prop29 will start another #CalBoondoggle NoOn29.com
Facebook
ICYMI: LA Times recommends No on 29. CA cannot afford another ballot-box boondoggle. Learn more at NoOn29.com
Big endorsement for No on 29 LA Times says The problem with Proposition 29... isnt the tax but how the money it raises would be spent. NoOn29.com
ICYMI: Prop 29 takes perfectly good tax money and misspends it, says LA Times. Learn more at NoOn29.com.
The Orange County Register's Editorial Board unequivocally opposes Prop. 29 because It would add another layer of taxation to the tune of more than $800 million a year.
OC Register Editorial Board on Prop. 29: voters don't have to wait until November to gird for another tax assault. Proposition 29 on the June 5 ballot will be a
preliminary skirmish. The Register's Editorial Board unequivocally opposes Prop. 29. It would add another layer of taxation to the tune of more than $800 million a year. Like so many assaults on taxpayers, this one is couched in do-good language. But we don't recall any tax increases promoted for what their backers admitted were bad causes.
LA Times recommends No on Prop 29. Says California can't afford to retain its K-12 teachers, keep all its parks open, give public college students the courses they need to earn a degree or provide adequate home health aides for the infirm or medical care for the poor. If the state is going to raise a new$735 million, it should put the money in the general fund rather than dedicating it to an already well-funded research effort. Funding priorities shouldn't be set at the ballot box. NoOn29.com
In Case You Missed It: The Press-Enterprise says Prop. 29 asks Californians to tie the states tangled finances in even bigger knots, to pay for services that are not a priority for the states limited public funds.
The June 5th election is just over a month away and the campaign has kicked into high gear. We recently released ads that you may have seen or heard if not, you can watch and listen to them here.
Now, more than ever, we need your help spreading our message throughout California. Here are few ways
you can help:
Stay Informed. Read the recent editorials by the Los Angeles Times, Orange County Register and The Press-Enterprise on why they all oppose Prop. 29.
Engage Online. By posting on Facebook and Twitter, you can communicate quickly and easily with your friends, family, colleagues and members why Prop. 29 is wrong for California.
Stay Informed
Read the editorial by the Los Angeles Times Recommending No on 29
Read the Orange County Register editorial against Prop. 29 here
The Press-Enterprise editorial board came to the conclusion that Californians should vote No on 29
Sample Facebook/Twitter Posts
#Prop29 is 4,515 words of fine print, loopholes & flaws. readforyourself.org
OC Register says NO to #Prop29! Make sure you vote NO on Prop. 29 this June 5! http://shar.es/2pk8U
In case you missed it: @OCReggie says Prop. 29 a bad way to fund a good cause #NoProp29 http://shar.es/2pk8U
The Orange County Register's Editorial Board unequivocally opposes Prop. 29. #NoProp29 http://shar.es/2pk8U
The @LATimes goes No on #Prop29 !! Funding priorities shouldnt be set at the ballot box http://lat.ms/I5X3nc
From @LATimes EdBoard: We recommend a No vote on Proposition 29. http://lat.ms/I5X3nc
Says @LATimes #Prop29 well intentioned but doesnt make sense. http://lat.ms/I5X3nc and #Prop29 will start another #CalBoondoggle NoOn29.com
ICYMI: LA Times recommends No on 29. CA cannot afford another ballot-box boondoggle. Learn more at NoOn29.com
Big endorsement for No on 29 LA Times says The problem with Proposition 29... isnt the tax but how the money it raises would be spent. NoOn29.com
ICYMI: Prop 29 takes perfectly good tax money and misspends it, says LA Times. Learn more at NoOn29.com.
The Orange County Register's Editorial Board unequivocally opposes Prop. 29 because It would add another layer of taxation to the tune of more than $800 million a year.
OC Register Editorial Board on Prop. 29: voters don't have to wait until November to gird for another tax assault. Proposition 29 on the June 5 ballot will be a
preliminary skirmish. The Register's Editorial Board unequivocally opposes Prop. 29. It would add another layer of taxation to the tune of more than $800 million a year. Like so many assaults on taxpayers, this one is couched in do-good language. But we don't recall any tax increases promoted for what their backers admitted were bad causes.
LA Times recommends No on Prop 29. Says California can't afford to retain its K-12 teachers, keep all its parks open, give public college students the courses they need to earn a degree or provide adequate home health aides for the infirm or medical care for the poor. If the state is going to raise a new$735 million, it should put the money in the general fund rather than dedicating it to an already well-funded research effort. Funding priorities shouldn't be set at the ballot box. NoOn29.com
In Case You Missed It: The Press-Enterprise says Prop. 29 asks Californians to tie the states tangled finances in even bigger knots, to pay for services that are not a priority for the states limited public funds.
