What's new

Cuba: No Talks With Bush

Jimmy2

City that never sleeps
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
54
AP Interview: Cuba: No Talks With Bush
By MATTHEW LEE – 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Cuba is not interested in improving relations with the United States while President Bush is in office and will wait for a change in U.S. leadership before extending anew an offer for dialogue, Cuba's top diplomat in the U.S. said Thursday.

As the island nation heads into weekend parliamentary elections that undoubtedly will extend the ailing Fidel Castro's grip on power, Havana is looking to America's vote in November to decide whether it wants to talk to Washington, said Jorge Alberto Bolanos Suarez, head of the Cuban Interest Section in Washington.

In an interview with The Associated Press, he said Cuban offers for dialogue with the United States made by Castro's brother, Raul, after he took day-to-day control of the government in 2006 were not intended for the Bush administration, which staunchly supports the nearly 46-year-old U.S. economic embargo of Cuba that was designed to choke off funds to the Castro government in an effort to force a change in the communist system there.

"When Raul spoke about it he was not referring to the present administration," Bolanos said. "He was speaking clearly that after the U.S. elections, the new (U.S.) government should take a position with regard to Cuba.

"That is the time when Cuba would be ready to dialogue on the basis of mutual respect, without the arrogance that has always colored the U.S. position," he said in Spanish. "I'm not concerned what the current State Department says because we are waiting for what the next one has to say about Cuba."

Soon after emergency intestinal surgery forced Castro in July 2006 to cede power to a provisional government headed by his brother, Raul Castro reached out for dialogue with the U.S. government as long as Cuba's sovereignty was respected. He repeated the offer in December 2006 in a sign he had consolidated his leadership during Fidel's absence.

Many longtime Cuba watchers consider Raul the more pragmatic of the Castros, and likely to communicate better with Washington. At the time of the offers, the State Department brushed them off, saying Castro should open a dialogue with his people, end the one-party communist political system and hold free and fair elections.

Bolanos' comments on Thursday appeared to indicate that Havana is digging in its heels, refusing all but cursory contact with the United States until Bush, who has pursued strong anti-Castro policies for his seven years as president so far, is gone in January 2009.

Prospects for significant changes in U.S. policy toward Cuba no matter who takes over the White House from Bush, however, are uncertain.

Meanwhile, Bolanos said the 81-year-old Castro, who has not been seen in public since ceding power to Raul, might not be healthy enough to campaign for Sunday's elections in Cuba, but he is strong enough to work for the Cuban people.

"He has always won the seat, he has always gotten the highest (proportion) of votes of the population. I think this election will not be different," Bolanos said.

He disputed persistent U.S. charges that Cuban elections fall far short of democratic standards.

"There is nothing which Cuba does, nothing which Cuba says that is considered positive by the United States," Bolanos said. "This is not something strange or extraordinary that they don't consider it positive the way and means of how we elect our candidates."

Cubans are electing representatives to the country's legislature, or National Assembly, from a slate of candidates nominated earlier by municipal councils.

Cuba's government has not given details about Castro's illness or where he is being treated, but has released photos and video every few months, meant to confirm he is on the mend.

The latest of those was released Wednesday when government television broadcast images of a frail but upbeat Castro meeting Brazil's visiting President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva a day earlier.

The first video of Castro in three months showed him sitting and listening intently with a finger pressed to his forehead, then later standing and speaking, waving a finger for emphasis. "I have felt very good, very good," he says in the only audible comment in the 60 seconds of footage.

But in an essay published by state news media Wednesday, Castro said he is not yet healthy enough to address Cuba's people in person and can't campaign. "I am not physically able to speak directly to the citizens of the municipality where I was nominated for our elections," he wrote.

Bolanos said he had spoken by phone with Castro last month when he was in Havana and that "he was in good form."

"He is following medical advice and is abiding by them," the envoy said. "We are not as concerned about that as some are here in the United States. He is writing and working and handling the strategies of the government."
 

dpricenator

BoM March 08
Rating - 100%
175   0   3
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
14,899
Location
The OC
You know what though, I voted for Bush twice and If I were in Cuba's possition, I wouldn't want to talk with him either. He's a stuboun good ol boy. Cuba knows he's not going to budge, and there is much better chance of a new administration wanting to show it's willingness for international diplomacy reform. If we want to end communism there, we need to show then first hand that democracy works. being friends is generally a better way to lead someone in your direction. Not that I know diddly about politics or foreign policy, but my .02
 
Rating - 100%
17   0   0
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
2,056
Location
Sugar Land, TX
Who really cares if they want to talk, nothing would have changed no matter who was in the white house. I voted for Bush as well, and would vote for him again over the choices I had. Both Kerry and Gore would dhave been much worse.
 

dpricenator

BoM March 08
Rating - 100%
175   0   3
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
14,899
Location
The OC
Who really cares if they want to talk, nothing would have changed no matter who was in the white house. I voted for Bush as well, and would vote for him again over the choices I had. Both Kerry and Gore would dhave been much worse.
Agreed
 

Jimmy2

City that never sleeps
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
54
dpricenator I agree by ending the embargo I think the government would change over time with the influx of American going there.

Also the embargo was put in place to hurt the Gov of Cuba which it has not it has only hurt the people of that country.

Also most of our allies are helping Cuba with hundreds of millions in assistance which makes our embargo useless.

The full Embargo was put in place because of the missile crisis which is long gone and not a threat no more.

The only reason like it or not that the embargo is in place is because of votes in Florida so the people in Cuba will suffer until it ends.

Even when Kennedy signed the Embargo papers in his memoirs he put that he did not want a travel embargo for Americans there he said as American we should travel freely.

Also Prez Ford almost ended the Embargo but Castro dealing's in Africa hurt that chance of ever happening.
 
Top