finally one that is actually close.

[hdroadglide]

these must have been picked by actual cigar smokers.
http://www.askmen.com/fine_living/top_10/20_top_10.html

 

[BrooksW]

Better the CA's list (but then, a dog throwing up bits of paper with random cigar names on them is better then CA's list)...

But no Tats? Seems odd when they have so many to choose from...

~brooks

 

[n.olson]

i have to agree about the tats. but at least with the parings, you know these guys AT LEAST smoked them

 

[Volusianator]

Opus at No. 3, it's blasphemy. OK, not really, that is a nice list.

 

[terrantheman]

It's a nice list except for that Partagas LE 2000 never had one that was worth a shit in the flavor department... Thankfully it's all subjective... I love every other Party LE I think they missed the boat on that one by a mile.

 

[SkinsFanLarry]

No Tat's, DPG's, or anything by Dion?

Looks like they were "name" conscience with their selections to me.

 

[Patrick B]

Yep, missed my tastes by a mile, so it must be wrong. :yes:

Not a bad selection, though!

 

[CAJoe]

Not sure what to think about this list since I have tried only one of the smokes on it. That being said, I am leery on it not seeing one of Pete's or Dion's sticks on it.

 

[Moro]

That website...shitty as it might be, in a way it got me into cigars.

 

[Electric Sheep]

6 CCs and 4 NCs--much more realistic than CA's lists!

I admit that I'd probably have a Tat in their instead of the La Aurora, but that's just a personal preference. I certainly think the Opus and Padron Annis are fitting for such a list.

 

[RobustoMoe]

That looks fairly reasonable. Although my experience is quite limited in non-cubans but I've had a Padron 1926 during my honeymoon and did the exact profile ! :awholelot