What's new

Gov. Schwarzenegger Vetos Anti Smoking Bill

Angry Bill

2x BoM, BoY '08
Staff member
Rating - 100%
201   0   0
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
11,947
Location
San Fernando Valley, CA
Governor rejects smoking ban at beaches, parks
Marisa Lagos, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Tuesday, May 4, 2010


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(05-03) 17:43 PDT Sacramento -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill Monday that would have prohibited smoking at nearly all state beaches and parks, saying the law would have been too intrusive and would not have done much to curb litter on California's shoreline.

The groundbreaking legislation would have created the nation's most far-reaching smoking ban in a state that already restricts people from lighting up in cars with children, restaurants and bars. State Sen. Jenny Oropeza, D-Long Beach, who authored the bill, said Schwarzenegger's veto stands in "stark contrast to what is already being done at more than 100 local cities and counties statewide," including smoking bans at beaches and parks controlled by local jurisdictions. Oropeza and other supporters said the bill was necessary to cut down on litter, secondhand smoke and forest fires at the 278 parks and 64 beaches owned by the state.

"I'm sorry the governor did not agree with this widely supported effort to increase public awareness about the environmental threats carelessly tossed cigarettes are doing to our marine life and to the great outdoors," Oropeza said in a written statement.

But Schwarzenegger - whose cigar habit is well known - wrote in his one-page veto message that Senate Bill 4 was an "improper intrusion of government into people's lives." Noting that he has supported other smoking bans, the governor nonetheless said that Oropeza's bill "crosses an important threshold between state power and command and local decision making.

"There is something inherently uncomfortable about the idea of the state encroaching in such a broad manner on the people of California," Schwarzenegger wrote. "With respect to marine debris, I understand the challenge cigarette butts cause to our beaches and marine life. But, this bill applies the ban solely to those beaches and parks owned and operated by the state of California ... As we have seen, marine debris and litter know no boundaries."

Schwarzenegger also noted that the state Department of Parks and Recreation has some discretion to ban smoking in parks and beaches under certain circumstances, such as when fire hazards exist.

The bill, which was first introduced as a broader measure in 2006, would have imposed a $100 fine on people who violated the ban. After changes made during the legislative process last year, it exempted all state-owned campsites and parking lots as well as a vehicle recreation area in San Luis Obispo County, and could only have been enforced in areas where signs were posted advertising the ban.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/03/BA1Q1D8VVL.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0myf4bQOS


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/03/BA1Q1D8VVL.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0myf4dh6w



This is a prime reason to support the CRA and get involved. Of course, it helps that Arnold smokes cigars too! Let's keep fighting the fight! Perserve our rights!
 
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
895
Location
Houston, TX
Governor rejects smoking ban at beaches, parks
Marisa Lagos, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Tuesday, May 4, 2010


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(05-03) 17:43 PDT Sacramento -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill Monday that would have prohibited smoking at nearly all state beaches and parks, saying the law would have been too intrusive and would not have done much to curb litter on California's shoreline.

The groundbreaking legislation would have created the nation's most far-reaching smoking ban in a state that already restricts people from lighting up in cars with children, restaurants and bars. State Sen. Jenny Oropeza, D-Long Beach, who authored the bill, said Schwarzenegger's veto stands in "stark contrast to what is already being done at more than 100 local cities and counties statewide," including smoking bans at beaches and parks controlled by local jurisdictions. Oropeza and other supporters said the bill was necessary to cut down on litter, secondhand smoke and forest fires at the 278 parks and 64 beaches owned by the state.

"I'm sorry the governor did not agree with this widely supported effort to increase public awareness about the environmental threats carelessly tossed cigarettes are doing to our marine life and to the great outdoors," Oropeza said in a written statement.

But Schwarzenegger - whose cigar habit is well known - wrote in his one-page veto message that Senate Bill 4 was an "improper intrusion of government into people's lives." Noting that he has supported other smoking bans, the governor nonetheless said that Oropeza's bill "crosses an important threshold between state power and command and local decision making.

"There is something inherently uncomfortable about the idea of the state encroaching in such a broad manner on the people of California," Schwarzenegger wrote. "With respect to marine debris, I understand the challenge cigarette butts cause to our beaches and marine life. But, this bill applies the ban solely to those beaches and parks owned and operated by the state of California ... As we have seen, marine debris and litter know no boundaries."

Schwarzenegger also noted that the state Department of Parks and Recreation has some discretion to ban smoking in parks and beaches under certain circumstances, such as when fire hazards exist.

The bill, which was first introduced as a broader measure in 2006, would have imposed a $100 fine on people who violated the ban. After changes made during the legislative process last year, it exempted all state-owned campsites and parking lots as well as a vehicle recreation area in San Luis Obispo County, and could only have been enforced in areas where signs were posted advertising the ban.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/03/BA1Q1D8VVL.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0myf4bQOS


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/03/BA1Q1D8VVL.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0myf4dh6w



This is a prime reason to support the CRA and get involved. Of course, it helps that Arnold smokes cigars too! Let's keep fighting the fight! Perserve our rights!
Of all the crap that he signed into law THIS is the line when it comes to improper government intrusion into peoples' lives???

What a crock! It never should have gotten to the point that legislators would even THINK that this kind of thing should be ok...
 
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
803
Our founding fathers would be disgusted with this infringement on our FREEDOM.

I'm tired of these left-wing nuts trying to tell us what we can or can't do. You mean to tell me that you are proposing to outlaw me from smoking my cigars when I go camping? or fishing? or just hanging at the beach?

I will not stand for it.

:riflefire
:riflefire
:riflefire
:riflefire
:riflefire
 
Rating - 100%
54   0   0
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
1,458
Location
Chatham, NJ
california uber alis

ever hear the live version with jello featuring the melvins?

he made it about the governator! lol
Posted via Mobile Device
 
Rating - 100%
160   0   0
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,345
Location
Central Coast, CA
there was never a doubt he would veto this. He has his smoking tent in the back of the mansion. But sad to say the next governer will clearly sign it. This wouldn't even be an issue if those cigarette smokers would pick up there butts
 
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
82
Location
Portland, Oregon
there was never a doubt he would veto this. He has his smoking tent in the back of the mansion. But sad to say the next governer will clearly sign it. This wouldn't even be an issue if those cigarette smokers would pick up there butts
yup, sad thing is whenever I'm at the beach I see it so much. There are even ash cans all over and it's so tough. I can maybe understand outside on the sidewalk, but on the friggin beach?
 
Rating - 100%
134   0   0
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,336
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Of all the crap that he signed into law THIS is the line when it comes to improper government intrusion into peoples' lives???

What a crock! It never should have gotten to the point that legislators would even THINK that this kind of thing should be ok...
I guess you didn't read the part where it has already been enacted in over 100 other jurisdictions that include beaches and parks in CA. The politician from Long Beach was only expanding it even further. It would appear the majority in CA seems to think this is a good thing and I am sure it will eventually get passed.
 
Top