So here's the situation.
My wife got in a car accident yesterday on her way to work. She hit some black ice on the highway and couldn't stop and ended up rear-ending a guy. She was going slow when she hit the guy, so slow in fact that the air bag didn't deploy.
Here's a picture of the damage:
She got out of the vehicle, checked to make sure the other driver was okay and checked the damage. Everyone was okay so she got back in her car and called the police. While waiting for the police, another car slipped on the same ice, the driver of that car lost control of the car and ended up rear-ending my wife while going backwards. The impact ended up causing my wife to hit the vehicle in front of her again.
Here is a picture of the damage sustained from the second impact:
And the damage from the car that hit her:
Here's my problem. When I called my insurance company yesterday, they told me that if the total damage to the vehicle exceeded 70% of it's value, they would consider it totaled. Today I received the estimates, which came to $6,000 and some change and was told the value of the vehicle is $7,800. There were two estimates done, one for the damage my wife is responsible for and one for the damage the driver that rear-ended my wife is responsible for.
To me this is simple math, the damage caused is ~77% of the vehicles value which to me, means it's totaled. When I called my agent today to discuss this, she said they are not going to total the vehicle because the claim they are paying doesn't exceed 70% of the vehicles value (they are only paying for the front end damage). I'm not to happy about this because I'm going to be getting a car back that would have otherwise, been considered totaled.
Does anybody have any advice on how to approach this with my insurance company? I've thought about dropping the claim with the other drivers insurance company and filing the entire thing with my insurance company. That would then make the repair costs exceed the 70% mark.
I know they are looking out for their bottom line, but what experiences have you guys had in dealing with insurance adjusters? Do they ever budge on their stance? Am I fighting a losing battle here? Thoughts???
My wife got in a car accident yesterday on her way to work. She hit some black ice on the highway and couldn't stop and ended up rear-ending a guy. She was going slow when she hit the guy, so slow in fact that the air bag didn't deploy.
Here's a picture of the damage:
She got out of the vehicle, checked to make sure the other driver was okay and checked the damage. Everyone was okay so she got back in her car and called the police. While waiting for the police, another car slipped on the same ice, the driver of that car lost control of the car and ended up rear-ending my wife while going backwards. The impact ended up causing my wife to hit the vehicle in front of her again.
Here is a picture of the damage sustained from the second impact:
And the damage from the car that hit her:
Here's my problem. When I called my insurance company yesterday, they told me that if the total damage to the vehicle exceeded 70% of it's value, they would consider it totaled. Today I received the estimates, which came to $6,000 and some change and was told the value of the vehicle is $7,800. There were two estimates done, one for the damage my wife is responsible for and one for the damage the driver that rear-ended my wife is responsible for.
To me this is simple math, the damage caused is ~77% of the vehicles value which to me, means it's totaled. When I called my agent today to discuss this, she said they are not going to total the vehicle because the claim they are paying doesn't exceed 70% of the vehicles value (they are only paying for the front end damage). I'm not to happy about this because I'm going to be getting a car back that would have otherwise, been considered totaled.
Does anybody have any advice on how to approach this with my insurance company? I've thought about dropping the claim with the other drivers insurance company and filing the entire thing with my insurance company. That would then make the repair costs exceed the 70% mark.
I know they are looking out for their bottom line, but what experiences have you guys had in dealing with insurance adjusters? Do they ever budge on their stance? Am I fighting a losing battle here? Thoughts???