As far as Romeo y Julieta using similar labeling I don't see the harm at all? What do morals have to do with the band on a cigar? If someone can read, they can clearly distinguish a CC from a NC.
At the same time, some might suggest that you don't know the spirit of this web forum. If you want to debate, take it to the debate forum. Otherwise, generally speaking, we try to keep the posting respectful and without snarky, snide comments. That way this place remains different from all the other web forums.
Hence, why I took it down.
Thank you.
I don't necessarily believe that a smaller ring gauge makes a cigar tastier. I believe the bigger ring gauge Padron 1926 series are as good, if not better than the smaller ring gauge. It's been my experience that a smaller ring guage sometimes doesn't give me as good as a draw as a 54 or even sometimes a 60 can, and IMO a bigger draw depending on the cigar gives me better flavors. Personally, I prefer boxed press or favtory press cigars as the smoking experience is better overall, but it's not an absolute. I like the box press My Father 60 RG more than the smaller ring guage ones, but then with Monte by Montecristo I like the corona size the most. However, with the La Flor Dominicana Factory Press IV, I don't believe it would be better with a smaller ring gauge or without the box press.
No, I hear you there. I can't speak for the DD or the Face, but in all other instances you are spot on. Even our new brother, ar####, has a point. Some things are better in a larger size. I am basing my opinion not on the general "smaller is better," but as a lover of all things JdN, I ALWAYS find a smaller rg better matches my tastes. Antano lance over all other antanos, the Celebracion corona over the others, the Cabinetta lance over the others, the "peligroso" over the other Dark Corojos, the Cyb lance over the rest. That's my take anyway.
