Are they different blends?
I can state as a FACT that Cabinet cigars were of a different blend until 1997. This is not an OPINION as to how they taste differently, they have different constructions. Cabinet cigars have a “solid foot”. That is, if you squeeze the foot, it does not yield. This is because the cigars are made from much bigger leaves and cut to the correct lengths. A lot of leaves are “wasted”. But this is the way to bunch cabinet cigars in order to give their rich taste. The tip of a tobacco leaf does not have much taste.
Up to 1997, the ratio of Cabinets to Dress Boxes of the same vitola was about 1 to 10. And during 1997, the time cigars shortage was at its height, Cabinets retailed in parallel cigar merchants in Hong Kong for 2.5 times the price as dress boxes. The “official” retail price of Cabinet cigars in Pacific Cigar was 20% higher than dress boxes.
In the UK, they are not even listed for sale. The cabinets were reserved for special customers. See the pic of the price list of JJ Fox in 1994. There are no cabinets listed.
Policies were changed during Autumn 1997, cabinet cigars began to have the same blend as dress boxes cigars and the retail price became the same. This is the beginning of the crazy era, in fact, in some cases the same cigars were produced for different vitolas. See this pic of 2 boxes of 0ASU (June 1998) of “Londres Finos/ Petit Partagás”, the same cigars (same size by the way) was packaged at the same time with 2 different vitola names. This was busted when the guy who packaged these 2 boxes fucked up and placed 2 different labels on the same boxes.
As for why this change was not mentioned in the MRN book. Francisco Linares’ reign as Head of Habanos S.A. ended in mid-2000. The following few years were extremely chaotic years when it comes to official policies. The new management just took over and many blundering policies were subjected to review. This coincided with the period when the MRN book was written. No one can tell whether this would be a permanent policy. If this is regarded as a blundering policy. This piece of history is better forgotten, to protect the reputation of Havana cigars.
This is again not from me but most of you can probably guess who it's from.