What's new

Roach-Klip: Cohiba 1966

kockroach

BoM August 2010/2011
Rating - 100%
218   0   0
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
2,288
Location
Chicago
A very good friend was kind enough to provide me with a few different cigars that he obtained while at the Habanos festival in February this year. He asked if I would provide a review of each one for BOTL. The first one I smoked was the Cohiba 1966 Edicion Limitada. The cigar measures 6 and 1/2 inches long, with a 52 ring gauge. The name is in honor of the 45th Anniversary of the birth of the Cohiba brand.

The cigar itself has a nice feel in the hand....firm, with a silky feel of the slightly oily wrapper. The construction is excellent. Barely a noticeable vein, or seam for that matter. The cigar is capped with a nice pigtail.



The pre-light draw is of a clean tobacco flavor. Upon lighting, the first third of the Cohiba 1966 offers up a earthy flavored smoke, mixed within is toast and tea leaves. Quite an interesting combination that I have never had before. It isn't a bad taste...not amazing either, but good so far. The ash fell just before I could get a picture, but it was a medium gray and was burning fairly straight.



The second third of the cigar did not really change much at all from the first third. This has me a little worried. I do know that it has been a few months since they were released at the festival (and I smoked this early April), and that they were fairly fresh at that time. Hopefully it isn't getting sick. The burn is still pretty straight, and produces a light gray ash.



Unfortunately, I cannot say that this cigar finished very well. The final third of the 1966 turned downhill pretty quick. It changed to a muddled, tangy flavor, that ultimately became harsh to smoke.



I believe that this cigar was probably into its sick period, and that I would caution anyone that has any that wants to smoke now. It may be good to wait a little while, unless you know that yours is very fresh. I wish that I could have provided a stellar review of this cigar at this time, but cannot.

What I did smoke (still about an inch left) lasted about 1:45.
 

orangedog

Navin R Johnson
Rating - 100%
83   0   0
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
2,504
Location
On A Plane
similar to my experience with these... hoping they turn out ok with a bit of time. didn't seem overly strong, without bold flavors... so I hope it ages well and becomes delicate without becoming mute.
 

gibbleguts

BoM april 09
Rating - 100%
166   0   0
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
3,224
Location
Wouldn't you like to know?
I loved these right off of the table but haven't been willing to try another since I have been he
aring they are going sick. Will retry in once they come out on the shelves.


Posted via Mobile Device
 
Rating - 100%
37   0   0
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
886
Location
New Jersey
Can someone explain a "sick" period? I have never heard this before. By reading my guess is that some cigars are good "off the truck" or with age on them but the time between new and aged the cigar is lacking????

Does this just apply to CC or NC as well?

Thanks in advance
 

Thecatch83

I smoke Opus like candy!
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
406
Location
Oregon/Tokyo/NAF Atsugi
Can someone explain a "sick" period? I have never heard this before. By reading my guess is that some cigars are good "off the truck" or with age on them but the time between new and aged the cigar is lacking????

Does this just apply to CC or NC as well?

Thanks in advance
From a forum on CA:

Looks like the "sick" period means different things to different people.

The term was an arbitrary invention by Gerard whose command of the English language isn't all that great, and he used it to give the impression that he had a huge stock of cigars in the boom years of the 1990's that he wouldn't ship because the cigars he had didn't have the proper "maturation".

In reality, as cigars develop, some report that they go "flat" and don't taste as good as or like they should taste, and describe that as a "sick" period. Those same people report that, after a time (a year? 2 years? 5 years?) the cigars somehow magically "come back to life" and are superb examples of this or that. Personally, I think it's a load. Do cigars develop? SURE!!! But don't be intimated by or afraid of the process of development.

The ammonia smell is NOT what is generally the characteristic of a cigar in a "sick" period. A cigar can be in a "sick" period without any hint of any "off" aroma...and even if a cigar has some pungency, it can still be a great smoke. So, don't go by the presence of absence of an "ammonia" smell, either, as an indication of whether a cigar is in a "sick" period.

Try a cigar...if it isn't as good as you think it should be, wait 6 months and then try another one. Maybe it'll be better, or maybe your experience of it will be better. But there's no set formula, so don't get all wigged out about whether your box of cigars is or is going to be in the "sick" period.


In laymen's terms; If a stick doesn't smoke well, or taste appealing ROTT, wait a while and revisit it down the road. A good rule of thumb that I use is at least two months to transition to my humidor. I will pull a few singles from my boxes so the maturation process happens sooner than later.
 

ciggy

"TommyBoy"
Rating - 100%
326   0   0
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
9,703
Location
Southwest Michigan
Okay officially...You Suck!! lol
Damn Jere, even though it's in a sick period, I'm sooooo jealous right now...thank you!!:hammersma
 
Last edited:
Top