- Joined
- Jan 23, 2016
- Messages
- 383
Gauge and length being equal, when comparing these two vitolas for the same cigar, I'm just wondering why one would go with the torpedo. The only reason I can think of is if you think the draw in the toro is too much. So basically, what I'm wondering is, if you like the draw after the toro is cut, is there any reason to opt for the torpedo of the same cigar? Would there ever be a taste (blending) difference in the two sizes if the length is somewhat similar?
This also brings up the fact that you start cutting down the torpedo immediately, so right away, you get less time out of it than a toro.
As an example, I just smoked the MFLB 1922 in torpedo. To get the draw I like, I had to cut it down so far that I was scared of getting below the cap line. I loved the cigar and am looking to buy a 5 pack and am wondering if I should just get the toro instead.
I once heard (I think it was Steve Saka or Nick Malilo) say that most cigars are initially blended to the toro size (and then adjusted to the other sizes)... I'm sure there are exceptions to this but I can see it being a general rule.
I'd love to hear your thoughts.
This also brings up the fact that you start cutting down the torpedo immediately, so right away, you get less time out of it than a toro.
As an example, I just smoked the MFLB 1922 in torpedo. To get the draw I like, I had to cut it down so far that I was scared of getting below the cap line. I loved the cigar and am looking to buy a 5 pack and am wondering if I should just get the toro instead.
I once heard (I think it was Steve Saka or Nick Malilo) say that most cigars are initially blended to the toro size (and then adjusted to the other sizes)... I'm sure there are exceptions to this but I can see it being a general rule.
I'd love to hear your thoughts.