I understand what you're saying here Eric and I agree with it in normal situations. Granted, I will recognize that this is your board and your rules are gospel. That said, I think you're ideas of isolationism are respectable but detrimental to the collective good of our group. We have an opportunity here to shape the future of our existence. Yes, when ICC went through it's crap last year (2 years ago?), it spilled onto other boards and caused gunk to build up everywhere. No one wants that unfounded & unnecessary drama. This situation is necessary. Our very way of conducting ourselves; that being a community where the passion is first and the business is second, is being challenged. This COULD be a final straw in turning our political perception to one that we have worked away from in the recent years (RTDA - IPCPR, PUFF.com - no separation from cigarettes). The acceptance & lethargy we show here may well damn us in the future.In the past (and general policy), I've let problems and discussions of other cigar communities not spill over into our community. Since BOTL is our community, the focus should be on that. Thinking positive and building our home rather than criticizing what others are doing; a proud and upheld trait that sets our cigar community apart from others.
With that said, there are two reasons why this thread still remains. One as a way of communicating with members of those affected communities who have chosen to come here and call BOTL their new home. It comes across to me that legitimate concerns from those have questioned their former community have either resulted in consequences or not being answered. While I nor others here can answer the questions, we do have a solution - our community.
The second reason is that I wanted to read the reactions after waiting 8 months. Jon did contact me in February about buying BOTL.org. After a week of communication I declined to sell. Rod made a few good points that I feel would be redundant in saying as well (unknown outsider, etc). Most (but not all) responses within this thread are what I expected. In the end, it made me more appreciative of what our community is really about. I did not want to give the community that has been loyal and put trust into this community throughout the years to feel I "sold out". BOTL is not what it is because of me but what YOU have contributed. For me to take the credit for the value of BOTL would be a travesty.
With that said, I'm asking everyone that we move forward. What Jon does with the websites he has purchased as well as those who sold are their business now. If we instead focus our energy on our community by upstanding the quality of membership and contributions, we will all benefit and have a place to call home - evermore.
But, and I am new here so take this with a grain of salt, it doesn't really appear as if this site has demonstrated either "acceptance" or "lethargy". In fact, it sounds like "acceptance" was the farthest thing from Eric's mind when he passed up the opportunity to personally profit from Mr. Caputo's offer in order to preserve the boards as a community of brothers where PIF is more than just a catchy saying...The acceptance & lethargy we show here may well damn us in the future.
I'm not sure exactly what you are implying here. Is it that we should be highly critical of said merger? Be more vocal in our criticism? :dunno:I understand what you're saying here Eric and I agree with it in normal situations. Granted, I will recognize that this is your board and your rules are gospel. That said, I think you're ideas of isolationism are respectable but detrimental to the collective good of our group. We have an opportunity here to shape the future of our existence. Yes, when ICC went through it's crap last year (2 years ago?), it spilled onto other boards and caused gunk to build up everywhere. No one wants that unfounded & unnecessary drama. This situation is necessary. Our very way of conducting ourselves; that being a community where the passion is first and the business is second, is being challenged. This COULD be a final straw in turning our political perception to one that we have worked away from in the recent years (RTDA - IPCPR, PUFF.com - no separation from cigarettes). The acceptance & lethargy we show here may well damn us in the future.
+1....what?:squinteyeI'm not sure exactly what you are implying here. Is it that we should be highly critical of said merger? Be more vocal in our criticism? :dunno:
yeah I'm in the middle of some drama on another board and it's just some trolls being argumentative. I'm to the point after only a few months, of being done with it.eric and dave are doing a fine job just as they are. Look at the history of other boards.
cigarweakly - quick growth, then down the tubes.
clubstogie - huge growth, bought out, now mass departures
numerous others have come and gone.
lawsuits, and various other bullshit.
meanwhile, here we are. slow, but steady growth.
in most part, the drama queens from other boards dont come here because they dont have a big enough audience, and dont get the desired respose to their posts.
same with the troublemakers that go board to board, they just dont see to come here.
personally, i like the isolationism.
i can go elsewhere to see drama and bullshit.
this is nice and peaceful. it seems that everyone fits in just fine.
GODOFFIRE911 FOR PRESIDENT:applause::applause::applause:The trouble makers seem to stay away and the one I saw that came by was swiftly dealt with and gone. That guy almost convinced me that GOF were the greatest cigars ever. :eyebrow:
But, and I am new here so take this with a grain of salt, it doesn't really appear as if this site has demonstrated either "acceptance" or "lethargy". In fact, it sounds like "acceptance" was the farthest thing from Eric's mind when he passed up the opportunity to personally profit from Mr. Caputo's offer in order to preserve the boards as a community of brothers where PIF is more than just a catchy saying...
Again, I'm new, so if I don't know what I'm talking about...fair enough.
Personally, I wish those other boards the best of luck. I don't think its a foregone conclusion that things will change for the worse. Having said that, I much prefer the more closely knit atmosphere that I've found here.
This week's Dogwatch Cigar Radio is great for discussion about Mr.Caupto. I'd personally like to thank Mark Aub (sp?) of Brother of the Leaf and Palio Cutters for his illuminating testimonial.
Mark (as well as Bob) expressed great background on what has happened in the past as well as what can be expected to happen in the future. Both positive and negative aspects of this venture were brought up that led to formidable thoughts & ideas to be expressed.
What I take out of their conversation is a clear idea of what needs to be done and I ask that you all follow me in one step or another: embrace or avoid. This is simple enough but will require action on our part for both avenues.
If we embrace these efforts of combining boards we need to be influential in conveying what we want! Yes the new owners prerogative will be most important to him but if we demand what we need, he'll have to listen or risk losing his cash cow. I don't know if there will be an open public request for ideas but even if there isn't we should be vocal. Tell him what you want or you have no reason to complain if you otherwise wouldn't have it! Realize that a large, collective organization could be a GREAT resource for having political clout. The CRA could gain much from puff .com and in turn, so could the average smoker. BUT(!!), we must be mindful of this giant we create to ensure it meets our needs.
If we cast off these efforts of combining boards we need to be just as influential!! The main benefit to having a collective forum is a collective voice. Yes, other perks exist but we reside in a lifestyle that benefits from the 'brotherhood' of it's citizens. Most any perk that a large forum could share, a quaint one could too (e.g. MFG interviews, sample cigars, etc.) I am getting sidetracked. What we need to do if we avoid PUFF is be diligent with our individual voice. We need to make a pact amongst ourselves to stand up for our rights as we would if we were a large group. Yes, strength in numbers is a reality but who's to say we can't come together a a collection of smaller 'boutique' boards or individuals to carry the same message as one large gathering would? 50,000 members or 50,000 supporters is the same thing; a big voice. So, my brothers, believe me when I say that avoiding the new conglomerate may well be a choice you make but it still comes with responsibility.
Wal-Mart is the corner store of the 21st century; perhaps this is the cigar analogy for that. Perhaps we're sick of "lower prices" and instead want personal, catered attention. This decision remains to be seen. Whatever choice we make as a united group, I support. Just as long as we make an informed, committed decision, I'll be there in the trenches with all of you. When considering the gravitation that occurs within this very hobby, I do think that one decision is the clear favorite. I don't tend to see many guys who smoke for 10 years only to settle on General Cigar as their favorite mfg...
(Also posted on Vintagecigarclub .com)
I understand what you're saying here Eric and I agree with it in normal situations. Granted, I will recognize that this is your board and your rules are gospel. That said, I think you're ideas of isolationism are respectable but detrimental to the collective good of our group. We have an opportunity here to shape the future of our existence. Yes, when ICC went through it's crap last year (2 years ago?), it spilled onto other boards and caused gunk to build up everywhere. No one wants that unfounded & unnecessary drama. This situation is necessary. Our very way of conducting ourselves; that being a community where the passion is first and the business is second, is being challenged. This COULD be a final straw in turning our political perception to one that we have worked away from in the recent years (RTDA - IPCPR, PUFF.com - no separation from cigarettes). The acceptance & lethargy we show here may well damn us in the future.
Brother, I respectfully choose to disagree.I understand what you're saying about how Eric's post is addressing the situation saying that we will not involve ourselves in the situation. What I'M saying is that this isolationism is likely to cause more damage than good. Read my previous posts in this thread that are below.