NICE...Brooks, I am smoking Tainos, Especiales and Noellas from May 2003. All great but they have a bit too much cedar on them. I have removed them from the boxes to reduce the cedar contact.
Marketing Genius. I see way to much of my money getting caught up in this La Verite "project".The only cigar that will be a true guide of vintage in our industry including the Cuban industry is my La Verite project. It's the only cigar you can really put a date behind like a vintage wine. A true vintage cigar.
Pete
Id love to hear that, but I doubt I'll be able to meet up with you anytime soon.To touch on an above comment. All cigars should be good of the bench and aging is good for them but if a cigar sucks off the bench, there is no amount of age that will help it.
I could debate this subject for years and newer Cuban cigars are the perfect target. Padron cigars will also come up in the conversation. If anyone meets up with me, ask me to explain.
You have to have the best of both worlds like a great wine otherwise you are selling crap.
Rob, NC's are similar to CC's. You are using a box date as a guide for CC's and we do that also for our cigars but that is not a true guide for vintage. They are all a blend. The only cigar that will be a true guide of vintage in our industry including the Cuban industry is my La Verite project. It's the only cigar you can really put a date behind like a vintage wine. A true vintage cigar.
Pete
Pete, I totally disagree with you on this. Yes, there are some cigars that suck and no amount of aging will help them. However, there are some cigars that do improve with age and become tremendous cigars. There are many examples of this that I could cite, but the one that sticks out in my mind are several boxes of H. Upmann Lonsdales that I bought a long time ago. When I first picked them up and tried them I thought they sucked, that I wasted my money and I was going to sell them off. A friend of mine told me to hang on to them or I would totally regret it. I gave them a year and they got better. Ten years later these cigars were so freakin' good I got a hard on! These were 1997 Lonsdales and I wish I still had some. So your statement doesn't always hold true. Yes, you need to start with quality tobacco, but sometimes that tobacco needs to age before it hits it's stride.To touch on an above comment. All cigars should be good of the bench and aging is good for them but if a cigar sucks off the bench, there is no amount of age that will help it.
Pete
Tubaman,Pete, I totally disagree with you on this. Yes, there are some cigars that suck and no amount of aging will help them. However, there are some cigars that do improve with age and become tremendous cigars. There are many examples of this that I could cite, but the one that sticks out in my mind are several boxes of H. Upmann Lonsdales that I bought a long time ago. When I first picked them up and tried them I thought they sucked, that I wasted my money and I was going to sell them off. A friend of mine told me to hang on to them or I would totally regret it. I gave them a year and they got better. Ten years later these cigars were so freakin' good I got a hard on! These were 1997 Lonsdales and I wish I still had some. So your statement doesn't always hold true. Yes, you need to start with quality tobacco, but sometimes that tobacco needs to age before it hits it's stride.
So Pete, with the limited knowledge I have with wines, would you say that the following is a good analogy?Also a true Estate Vintage cigar. One farm, one year, and the blend changes every year based on what that farm gives us. That's why is named La Verite, the Truth.