Diplomatico No 2

[JNT]

http://newcigarsmokerreviews.blogspot.com/2011/03/diplomatico-no-2.html

I haven't smoked a Cuban in awhile, after a tear trying to find some Non-Cuban sticks I like. Needed the break, and contemplated a Montecristo Edumndo. Reached for this one after a recent post comparing the Montecrsito No. 2 and the Diplomatico No. 2. I have a few Monte 2's under my belt, and absolutely love that cigar. This is supposed to be a cheaper alternative, that many prefer over the Monte.

The construction is good, but seems ever so sub par to a Monte 2 with veins, and bumps in the wrapper. I love the feel of a pyramid in the hand.

I get a good amount of earth, but this cigar also has a nutty flavour to it, which I'm not sure I get with the Monte. Very smooth. Burned like a champ.

The taste, while similar to a Monte 2, is not as full. The flavour profile seems more like a Guantanamera brand cigar (Cheap), minus the horrid construction, and draw issues. Overall I can't say anything bad about it.

I'll make this comparison. It's like drinking Coke, or Pepsi, or any other name brand product, and then going out and buying the no name brand. Even though their marketing it as cola, it just doesn't taste like the real thing. If these were significantly cheaper, like a no name, I would consider it an alternative, but I'm pretty sure this was only a couple bucks cheaper then a Monte 2.

 

[sonarman]

Thanks for the review bro. Consistency wise are they more or less consistent than a Monte 2? That may be worth a couple of bucks.

 

[JNT]

Can't say. I bought one, cause I heard good things. IMO, I'll pay the extra couple dollars. If they were several dollars cheaper, I would maybe consider it. Nothing beats that Monte taste.

 

[wilfredsimpson]

Great info, brother. Thanks for expanding on the monte vs. diplomatico thread.

 

[Clint]

http://newcigarsmokerreviews.blogspot.com/2011/03/diplomatico-no-2.html

I haven't smoked a Cuban in awhile, after a tear trying to find some Non-Cuban sticks I like. Needed the break, and contemplated a Montecristo Edumndo. Reached for this one after a recent post comparing the Montecrsito No. 2 and the Diplomatico No. 2. I have a few Monte 2's under my belt, and absolutely love that cigar. This is supposed to be a cheaper alternative, that many prefer over the Monte.

The construction is good, but seems ever so sub par to a Monte 2 with veins, and bumps in the wrapper. I love the feel of a pyramid in the hand.

I get a good amount of earth, but this cigar also has a nutty flavour to it, which I'm not sure I get with the Monte. Very smooth. Burned like a champ.

The taste, while similar to a Monte 2, is not as full. The flavour profile seems more like a Guantanamera brand cigar (Cheap), minus the horrid construction, and draw issues. Overall I can't say anything bad about it.

I'll make this comparison. It's like drinking Coke, or Pepsi, or any other name brand product, and then going out and buying the no name brand. Even though their marketing it as cola, it just doesn't taste like the real thing. If these were significantly cheaper, like a no name, I would consider it an alternative, but I'm pretty sure this was only a couple bucks cheaper then a Monte 2.

Apples to oranges...Like comparing a T52 to a Macanudo!

 

[cmhicksusmc]

As you said nothin beats the Monte taste!!!

 

[Thegreekone]

Hmmmm, Monte Edmundo. Or Petit Edmundo for that matter! :thumbsup:

 

[Soundwave13]

Nice review. Though I always enjoyed the Diplos. No, they are not as full as the Montes, but good IMHO in their own right.

Oh, and Pepsi sucks. :tongueout

 

[JNT]

i keep a 2L hooked IV to me all the time

 

[Sin]

Thanks for the review. Kind of makes me want to get some and compare the two.

 

[Coop]

Thanks for the review. Kind of makes me want to get some and compare the two.

For me as well!!!!

 

[AZ Heat]

Nice review. I have always liked these and find them much more consistant than the Monte's of late. Although when spot on, the monte would be my choice.

 

[JNT]

Still waiting to try the Boli Belicosa, and P2

 

[SkinsFanLarry]

Nice review and pic's my friend, thanks for sharing your experience.

I personally prefer the Partagas P2 myself. :cbig:

 

[torin]

Sounds like it might be worth a try. Thanks for the review!

 

[ciggy]

IMHO...These are a very good CC. I was really surprised when I smoked one hearing the comparisons but this cigar held up well an tasted really nice. As far as a low cost CC, this cigar has my vote!
Thanks for your review!

 

[weskimad]

When I want a change of pace and something flavorful but milder, I often reach for a diplo #2. They are not as pretty as other #2's, and while I've never had a draw or burn issue, the box I have all seem to be a little lighter in the hand. The perception that the tobacco is not rolled as tight might be why I experience looser draw (ie. no plugged sticks).