I do agree that cigars are best smoked with some age on them. At least 2 years, preferably 2 and 1/2 or more. I will put it this way, I have never had a GREAT young cigar, but have had numerous GREAT aged smokes ...
I have to respectfully disagree here. When it comes to CCs, for the MOST part, I agree, but now always. There are some smokes that smoke well ROTT. As Aaron mentioned, sometimes there is the exception depending on the cigar.
When it comes to NCs, Opus and Anejos, IMHO, need time. I have had an aged #9 Pig that was wonderful and complex, whereas a fresh T52 Corono Doble was just the kind of flavor bomb I needed and wanted on a recent Saturday.
It should also be said that some smokes LOSE something with age. For instance, Anniversary Padrons and 26s LOSE something the older they get. I got a #26 Sampler Box from 2007 and they were so bland. The richness was GONE, totally and completely. This was recently confirmed by a well-respected blogger on this board. Does that mean you won't like it? No. But, again, for the most part, like CCs needing age to hit that magic period, Padron Anniversary cigars are "generally" regarded as being better the fresher they are. As most know, the tobacco is already aged. On the other hand, the x000 series have come alive with age. Go figure.
Anyway, back on topic. :ccool:
Finally, I do agree that my first great CC was a Cohiba with serious age and it was, uh, an experience.