Judging from the title of this thread, it looks as if we are assuming that Vintage 1990 and 1992 means that the tobacco in those cigars comes from 1990 and 1992, respectively. If that's what this discussion is based on, I think it's just an assumption, and nothing more. I don't remember seeing anything in the marketing of these cigars that made that claim. I looked at the description on the CI website, and this is what it said:
"Vintage 1990 is a blend of Dominican and Nicaraguan Ligero draped in a tantalizing natural Broadleaf wrapper from Honduras. It's medium-bodied with a really enjoyable, complex smooth-rich flavor.
"Vintage 1992 offers the identical fillers and binder as the 1990, with the variation being very dark 10 year old Ecuadorian Sumatra wrapper. It's medium-bodied with a creamy, nutty, and full flavor."
So, the only claim of age is for the wrapper on the 92's, which is based on the number of years of aging, not the specific year of origin.
Am I missing something? I don't see anything misleading. :frownno:
"Vintage 1990 is a blend of Dominican and Nicaraguan Ligero draped in a tantalizing natural Broadleaf wrapper from Honduras. It's medium-bodied with a really enjoyable, complex smooth-rich flavor.
"Vintage 1992 offers the identical fillers and binder as the 1990, with the variation being very dark 10 year old Ecuadorian Sumatra wrapper. It's medium-bodied with a creamy, nutty, and full flavor."
So, the only claim of age is for the wrapper on the 92's, which is based on the number of years of aging, not the specific year of origin.
Am I missing something? I don't see anything misleading. :frownno: