ericdriscoll
CRA Ambassador #175966
And no Tats in the top 10? Why isn't this board flipping out? Jayman help me out here.
Probably because price goes up when you're on that list.And no Tats in the top 10? Why isn't this board flipping out? Jayman help me out here.
That must be why.....Probably because price goes up when you're on that list.And no Tats in the top 10? Why isn't this board flipping out? Jayman help me out here.
I've had none if it helpsGeez, I must be smoking some really shitty cigars, I've only had 6 of the 25.
I've had none if it helpsGeez, I must be smoking some really shitty cigars, I've only had 6 of the 25.
No, I don't really think that. I posted what I actually think earlier... I think CA thought this decision would restore some credibility, that's all. The recent Monte 2's are by most accounts are smoking very well, and it removes the "they'll never pick a Cuban cause Cuba can't advertise" stigma. Win win for CA.That could be the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen posted.
You truly think CA would rate a Cuban cigar #1 to drive sales to Altadis?
If so I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn...
Very well put.I love how CA picks the Prensado and they get slammed for going out on a limb with a cigar most people didn't think was superior, and then they get slammed for choosing an acknowledged classic that is smoking well this year. Some people are just going to hate because they feel like hating, I guess.
As for me, I don't care if some readers or retailers have trouble because they rate Cubans. Many Americans smoke Cuban cigars, CA's readers included, and it's helpful that they rate them alongside NCs.
You do realize Cubans have been #1 in the past which makes your argument completely invalid.No, I don't really think that. I posted what I actually think earlier... I think CA thought this decision would restore some credibility, that's all. The recent Monte 2's are by most accounts are smoking very well, and it removes the "they'll never pick a Cuban cause Cuba can't advertise" stigma. Win win for CA.That could be the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen posted.
You truly think CA would rate a Cuban cigar #1 to drive sales to Altadis?
If so I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn...
Don't think they gave the specific box code, but they did say it was from an April 2013 box, which I found very interesting....now we just have to find out the box code of the year that they rated...
First, I'm not really making an argument, I'm just BSin on a cigar site. That being said, the fact that they chose a Behike in '10 doesn't invalidate what I said. In '08 they went with a rogue choice. In '09 and '10 they played it safe with Cohiba and Padron. The past two years the selected out of the box choices and both years were trashed on the boards and at least in many conversations I was part of or overheard with cigar smokers. In my own opinion, they felt it was time to return to something safe.You do realize Cubans have been #1 in the past which makes your argument completely invalid.No, I don't really think that. I posted what I actually think earlier... I think CA thought this decision would restore some credibility, that's all. The recent Monte 2's are by most accounts are smoking very well, and it removes the "they'll never pick a Cuban cause Cuba can't advertise" stigma. Win win for CA.That could be the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen posted.
You truly think CA would rate a Cuban cigar #1 to drive sales to Altadis?
If so I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn...
Alright kev you and me, 10 box split we have to be ready for the year lolDon't think they gave the specific box code, but they did say it was from an April 2013 box, which I found very interesting....now we just have to find out the box code of the year that they rated...
Haha. Let's at least wait for a "sale", OK? I do love me some Monte 2's, but I personally think 3+ year aged ones absolutely blow the freshies out of the water.Alright kev you and me, 10 box split we have to be ready for the year lolDon't think they gave the specific box code, but they did say it was from an April 2013 box, which I found very interesting....now we just have to find out the box code of the year that they rated...
Same for me...only 5 of 25.Geez, I must be smoking some really shitty cigars, I've only had 6 of the 25.
Sales?!? With the 10 boxes we would make our own personal sale based on volume! A permanent coupon as it where! Come on, it's not peer pressure..... It's just your turnHaha. Let's at least wait for a "sale", OK? I do love me some Monte 2's, but I personally think 3+ year aged ones absolutely blow the freshies out of the water.Alright kev you and me, 10 box split we have to be ready for the year lolDon't think they gave the specific box code, but they did say it was from an April 2013 box, which I found very interesting....now we just have to find out the box code of the year that they rated...