Whether or not advertising has anything to do with it. They still only smoke one inch of a cigar for a review! They have verified this statement more than once in their personal blogs on the CA site. To me that is outrageous. And Gordon Mott trying to justify just smoking one inch is pathetic. Their reviews are useless.7-20-4 lancero scored a 92 in the most recent issue, highest rated cigar manufactured in Honduras and highest rated Lancero... never advertised with CA before. Remove the tinfoil caps gentlemen, its not nearly as bad as many think it is when it comes to advertising dollars having an effect on ratings.Whomever pays the most advertising money will determine the list. A bunch of horse crap IMO. Blind reviews and they only smoke an inch of each cigar. Example, Cigar of the year 2009 - Casa Magna??!?! Come on, really?
^ This right here summed up exactly how I feel.It is also done with more casual smokers then the ones here usually in mind. There are always some I agree with and some I laugh at but I still look forward to the list.
He also revised his statement and said he smokes up to half quite often. Still weird, but the one inch thing isn't valid anymore.Whether or not advertising has anything to do with it. They still only smoke one inch of a cigar for a review! They have verified this statement more than once in their personal blogs on the CA site. To me that is outrageous. And Gordon Mott trying to justify just smoking one inch is pathetic. Their reviews are useless.7-20-4 lancero scored a 92 in the most recent issue, highest rated cigar manufactured in Honduras and highest rated Lancero... never advertised with CA before. Remove the tinfoil caps gentlemen, its not nearly as bad as many think it is when it comes to advertising dollars having an effect on ratings.Whomever pays the most advertising money will determine the list. A bunch of horse crap IMO. Blind reviews and they only smoke an inch of each cigar. Example, Cigar of the year 2009 - Casa Magna??!?! Come on, really?
If you look at their reviews monthly, Ligas do not rate that well.Ive always wondered why they havent, and i think its because they arent sold in enough stores? dont know if anyone can clarify ?
A lot of people keep mentioning this cigar. I smoked it once, and didn't come away to impressed. After seeing the support for the cigar, I think I might give it another try.My Father El Centurion
new one or old one? Old ones seem a little too mild for me now.Had a Special S last night, but don't tell Jerome....
Well it is all a matter of preferance. For me I will smoke general and Altadis stuff ahead of liga. I know many here love liga the only ones I kinda enjoy are the OR#9's. One of the very few cigars I remember hating was the Pre release T52 pig. Still the worst cigar I have smoked this decade. That said I still respect the fact that they are good cigars just do to the fact that I respect so many smokers that love them. I think we all need to remember just cause I don't like them doesnt make them bad cigarsIf you look at their reviews monthly, Ligas do not rate that well.Ive always wondered why they havent, and i think its because they arent sold in enough stores? dont know if anyone can clarify ?
I think some of the testers CA use like more milder cigars. For the most part, members of this forum like stronger cigars, but that is not a good barometer of the average cigar smoker. Stronger cigars are growing in popularity, but the bulk of cigar smokers care for more medium and mild cigars. I am guessing CA uses a broad group of smokers for their reviews, in order to get a more encompassing opinion of the cigars.Well it is all a matter of preferance. For me I will smoke general and Altadis stuff ahead of liga. I know many here love liga the only ones I kinda enjoy are the OR#9's. One of the very few cigars I remember hating was the Pre release T52 pig. Still the worst cigar I have smoked this decade. That said I still respect the fact that they are good cigars just do to the fact that I respect so many smokers that love them. I think we all need to remember just cause I don't like them doesnt make them bad cigarsIf you look at their reviews monthly, Ligas do not rate that well.Ive always wondered why they havent, and i think its because they arent sold in enough stores? dont know if anyone can clarify ?
When cigars are rolled they are moist, especially the wrapper, to allow for easier rolling. Cigars that arent wet packed are usually 'dried out' a bit before they are boxed up. Wet packing means that they are sealed in a package, usually foil, when they are still in this moist state. Google it, might give you a better description than me.What is a Wet Pack?
It could certainly get my vote... Great cigar! Top three in my bookI think the DPG 10th could win....
7-20-4 lancero scored a 92 in the most recent issue, highest rated cigar manufactured in Honduras and highest rated Lancero... never advertised with CA before. Remove the tinfoil caps gentlemen, its not nearly as bad as many think it is when it comes to advertising dollars having an effect on ratings.Whomever pays the most advertising money will determine the list. A bunch of horse crap IMO. Blind reviews and they only smoke an inch of each cigar. Example, Cigar of the year 2009 - Casa Magna??!?! Come on, really?