What's new

Liga Privada Unico Papas Fritas

Rating - 100%
4   0   0
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
241
Location
North woods of Wisconsin
I thought I'd throw up a couple cigar reviews as a way of letting folks here get to know a bit about me. I was a reviewer for SMOKE magazine for a number of issues in 1999 and really liked the style of review they made us do. I have used it ever since. Here's a recent review.

A little aside - this review is also posted on another bulletin board. I did a review there after I had bemoaned it being a short filler stick selling for $7 a pop (still think that is outrageous). Someone sent me a couple, so I tried it. Here is that review.

Liga Privada Unico Papas Fritas
4 1/2 x 44 Petit Corona


Given that I poo-pooed a short filler cigar being sold at the price of a hand-rolled premium stick, I figured that now having one, I really should smoke it and review it. I must admit a bit of trepidation doing so, for I have had numerous short and/or mixed filler cigars in the past 32+ years of smoking cigars. As such, I was expecting some things to happen in the smoking of this cigar.

0.0 - 2.0 = poor/inferior quality
2.1 - 2.9 = fair
3.0 - 3.5 = good
3.5 - 4.5 = excellent
4.6 - 5.0 = superior

1) Aesthetics: A rather ugly wrapper hugs this petite corona, dark with lots of veins, but a bit oily too, that is promising. I like the pigtail cap and the band on the foot of the cigar – a simple statement. I like that.
Score for aesthetics: 3.9

2) Pre-light Construction: I expected soft spots, spaces where the filler was uneven – couldn’t find them. I hefted it my hand expecting it to be a lightweight – disappointed again. I expected it to smell like a LP, robust and full of tobacco – and it did. The pigtail cap was broken off in the cellophane as I went to remove the stick, that was probably my doing. It was a bit drier than I expected, but it had just traveled from Alabama, and it had sat in my car in frigid temps for the last 4 hours.
Score for Pre-light construction: 4.6

3) Post-light Construction/How it smoked: WOW! No floaters (maybe because I didn’t have a hole in it big enough for floaters to… (OK, it was big enough, but floaters didn’t appear.) What is more, I have premium smokes that didn’t burn as evenly as this one did, I have had uber-premiums that didn’t burn this well. Finally, not wanting to have the ash drop on my lap, I had to coax it off at a good inch to inch and a half. I mention these three items, because these are the three things that I feared most about a short-filler cigar. It smoked cool and even all the way to the nub.
Score for post-light construction: 4.8

4a) Flavor and strength – 1st 1/3: There is a lot of smoke production for this little cigar. A touch of cedar, some pepper, burnt cocoa, and a hint of coffee and very full flavored, might even claim it was strong.

4b) Flavor and strength – 2nd 1/3: As it headed into the 2nd third, the flavors didn’t change much.

4c) Flavor and strength – Last 1/3: Nor did they change much here either.
Through it all, this was a stronger flavored cigar and mild to medium-bodied in the nic department. I did however find it rather one-dimensional. While it was a dimension that I enjoyed, the lack of complexity left me a bit disappointed. I did nub it as it was a “nice” smoke. That lack of complexity and change also left me a bit confused, “how can a short-filler cigar perform that way.” I expected it to be all over the map. Oh yeah, do not snork this bad boy, it will do a number on your nose.

Score for flavor and strength: 3.4

5) Aftertaste/Finish: This stick had a rather long finish, resting on the palate for a bit. It was rich cigar taste that was left, nothing fancy, nothing exciting, though it was a nice aftertaste.
Score for aftertaste: 3.4

6) Aroma: Fairly strong aroma, bit of burnt sweetness and pepper.
Score for aroma:3.6

7) General Comments: I don’t know that I can give an overall score for this cigar, for I only had the one. What I did find was that I must eat a bit of crow, this short-filled smoke performed like a serious premium cigar, kudos to Drew Estates for that. While the flavors were not entirely in my “WOW” section, they were very pleasant. I also haven’t had a LP that impressed me yet, they appear to want to be strong without a whole lot of nuance or complexity. I want a stick to keep me incredibly interested. Thankfully, this only lasted about 30 minutes, so I wasn’t burned out quickly on that lack of excitement. It was an enjoyable smoke.

Overall score for the cigar: 4.1

8) Recommendation: Would you recommend the cigar? As much as I regret saying it, yeah, I’d recommend this cigar. I cannot say that it is a cigar I’d buy, because I like more complexity, and I also have this prejudice in my head about spending $6.00 for a short filler cigar – even knowing that it performs like a champ.
 

Craig Mac

BoM 4/10 7/11 12/14
Rating - 100%
446   0   0
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
9,494
Location
Hampton Roads VA
Thanks for the review. Personally, with the quality of the tobacco being used I find the "I wouldn't pay $6 for short filler" a weak argument for a good cigar. At first I kind of thought that way too, until I smoked the cigar and saw that $6 really wasn't unreasonable. If you like the cigar and like smoking it what difference does it make? Many people justify paying top dollar for Padron, Davidoff and Opus because they like the cigar and the quality of tobacco they use for them.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
37
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Thanks for the review. Personally, with the quality of the tobacco being used I find the "I wouldn't pay $6 for short filler" a weak argument for a good cigar. At first I kind of thought that way too, until I smoked the cigar and saw that $6 really wasn't unreasonable. If you like the cigar and like smoking it what difference does it make? Many people justify paying top dollar for Padron, Davidoff and Opus because they like the cigar and the quality of tobacco they use for them.
This. If it tastes good it is good. Short filler or long filler. Amazing little smokes.
 

Hoshneer

Drew Estate NotRex
Rating - 100%
96   0   0
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
7,523
Location
Fort Wayne, IN
It's a pretty good smoke, I will be honest though it's not a $6 smoke. I think I would jump on them all day long for maybe $4-5. I have a hard time with these because they are the best short filler out there. Let's be honest when I can buy a Padron Panatela or Ambassador for under $6 and it's not short filler, I will go with a Padron almost every time. A good smoke but it's not worthy of the price tag in my eyes.

Btw - Good going on the review! :)
 
Last edited:
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
241
Location
North woods of Wisconsin
Short filler or not, while it wasn't bad, I still didn't think they were worth $6 a pop. I like a cigar that has some changes in flavor, that grows and fades, and has something exiting happening. A cigar that remains constant, even if it has flavors I like, gets boring. I call it the issue of being one-dimensional. This cigar was that. I won't spend $6 on a cigar that doesn't "wow" me.

If this is your cigar, if you really enjoy this, then more power to you. As I like to say, "Smoke what YOU like, and enjoy it."
 
Rating - 100%
112   0   0
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
2,303
Location
Near Twin Cities MN
Great review layout!
This cigar personally wowed me, I will definitely admit, the $6+ price tag scares me away from reaching for it often, but I feel a short treat is called for every few weeks or so. I'm happy that JD, Saka and Co are listening to us consumers! A smaller RG Liga of any sort will be at the top of my to try list.
Again, thanks for the review
 
Top