here, let me help get you there...
http://botl.org/community/forums/showthread.php?t=1220
http://botl.org/community/forums/showthread.php?t=1220
I don't know how to post links with firefox, but go to latimes.com and then click the "Nation" section.Jwrussell said:Dang Gonz, you get a little fired up about this don't you? To answer your question, it's nothing to me. For all I care, they can legalize it. And I didn't know those drugs passed through so quickly.
Scott,
I'm still waiting to see something that actually has something about someone getting fired because of this. Not saying it didn't happen, just haven't seen it yet. Plenty about people threatening to do it, but not about it actually happening.
Actually wasn't kidding, have been participating in the other thread in Cigars, and felt there was a point to be made. It's a slippery slope when we start giving up rights under the guise of drug use.scottsins said:if you're kidding, you should see the story of that actually happening recently.
I was just reading old threads but that makes a lot of sense to me.Wasch_24 said:If someone that has any illegal substances in their system wants a job bad enough they will ensure that the chemicals are flushed before submitting anyway. To me, pre-emplotment drug tests are a waste of money. The better solution to obtain a drug free work place is to make it known that at anytime for any reason an employee will have to submit a random urinalysis.
Get that from OUT COLD? I like that movie.gonz said:it's only funny if you shit in the cup too.
as far as i'm concerned, that's what they're getting...
unreasonable violation of my privacy.
you want my piss? heres some shit too.