That would be good, too.Honestly I would like to see a petit corona.
Mmm, yes that would be delicious :drool:.Honestly I would like to see a petit corona.
The Tim Lance as I call it... Very tasty!The T-52 wrapper can make most anything taste good. Last February at Drew Estate I blended a lancero with a T-52 wrapper. I think it came out pretty tasty. Also AquaRich did a lonsdale with the wrapper that Jere reviewed here very favorably. It would be a winner.
That was a really good cigar Tim, thanks for the opportunity to try one. I also remember how impressed Jon was with it when we were in his office smoking them, and IIRC, his personal preference is not for narrow RGs.The T-52 wrapper can make most anything taste good. Last February at Drew Estate I blended a lancero with a T-52 wrapper. I think it came out pretty tasty. Also AquaRich did a lonsdale with the wrapper that Jere reviewed here very favorably. It would be a winner.
for sureI think this board as a whole is a lancero whore.. I know I am.
I too find calling a 40+RG cigar a "lancero" awkward, but if that's the name Jon wishes to use that's his prerogative.Oh yea, the smaller ring, the better. I know there is an LP "Lancero" out there in Pre-prod, though I think it's 40-ring or something, hence my "lancero" in quotes. Not sure if it's #9, T52, or Unicos-bound. I'd love to try it, the more of these wrappers, the better.
I'd also love to see 2nd or mixed-filler sub-line of the Liga Privadas (akin to the J Fuego Origen Originals or Illusione Cuchillos Cubanos). JD and SS are so meticulous, you know a lot of stuff doesn't make it to the boxes ... I'd like to smoke all that, lol. I'd happily take some off-color T52s or wholly #9s!
--Nate
Given that it's not a true size... lol.I too find calling a 40+RG cigar a "lancero" awkward, but if that's the name Jon wishes to use that's his prerogative.