- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 167
They didn't open a 2 page add????:eyepoke:How does a cigar score 92,93 or 94 in the initial testing and not even crack the list?
They didn't open a 2 page add????:eyepoke:How does a cigar score 92,93 or 94 in the initial testing and not even crack the list?
smoke what you like, like what you smoke...who gives a crap about cigar aficianado's list? :argue:
Well when you only smoke an inch and a half at best...BTW, it says they puffed on some 700 NEW cigars. How did the older releases get on the list?
that's what (the slutty) she said.I probably smoked 1050 inches of cigar this year.
Absolutely....a couple of them have worked themselves up into quite a lather over what a bunch of self-important boobs at a magazine have to say about it. Not one of my top 25 cigars of 2010 made the list...who cares?The people in this thread discussing the list?
Happens all the time... Although I don't know if the AB Family Blend is moving, lol.I know for a fact my local B&M had two full boxes plus 8 cigars of the Viaje release on their sheleves since the original release and after CA announced they were the No.2 cigar of 2010 they were gone in 30 minutes!
Somebody please explain that to me! :scratchhe
I agree. CA is 80% ads and the rest is just about cigars, shops, and whatever else that has nothing to do with tobacco. Ads bring CA revenue, if that doesn't change their minds about ratings, I don't what does...I think CA is skewed towards their advertisers, naturally. And I think they believe that they are somehow the center of the cigar culture here in the US leading to an inflated sense of self worth and eventual irrelevancy.
People are easily swayed.I know for a fact my local B&M had two full boxes plus 8 cigars of the Viaje release on their sheleves since the original release and after CA announced they were the No.2 cigar of 2010 they were gone in 30 minutes!
Somebody please explain that to me! :scratchhe
There went your chance of anything in the future lol :eyebrow:People are easily swayed.
Thanks to the original poster who felt some of our cigars should of been on the list. The current CA Top 25 left us scratching our heads.
i know several people who are just like that. good guys, but the bigger the better, and they still not pronounce Oliva correctlyHappens all the time... Although I don't know if the AB Family Blend is moving, lol.
I've seen this happen three times in a B&M: "I don't smoke much, but I was reading CA... I saw that the Olivia (O-live-ee-uh) Series V or something got a good rating. Do you guys have those. I like a big cigar..."
B&M employee says: "We have those, but if you don't smoke much you might want to try something else..."
my guy has 12 boxes of the Viaje VOR. There will be 1 or 2 less shortlyI know for a fact my local B&M had two full boxes plus 8 cigars of the Viaje release on their sheleves since the original release and after CA announced they were the No.2 cigar of 2010 they were gone in 30 minutes!
Somebody please explain that to me! :scratchhe
Yes please!here is my guy's stock as of this morning on the Viaje's
This. I don't understand it as well. How does a cigar score a 94 and then not appear as a top cigar of the year? Makes no sense whatsoever. How does a 90 rated cigar make the list over a 94 rated cigar? Doesn't that then make your ratings throughout the year basically BS if you use them at the end of the year as a measuring stick? Whatevs.Also strange that several brand vitolas that were rated from 90 to 94 in Cigar Insider (Alec Bradley Family Blend, El Triunfador, Room 101 Conjura Edition, Ramon Allones) to name a few, were not even included in the top 25? How does a cigar score 92,93 or 94 in the initial testing and not even crack the list?