The Cabaiguan Guapos came out YEARS before the Behike 54. Same size, pigtail cap, etc. Then the Behike came out in that size. Did Cohiba "rip-off" Tatuaje? I really doubt it.
Now Pete is doing a new line with that size, as well as the other 2 Behike sizes because those are popular. I don't get the problem with this, nor do I get a "rip off" vibe from this at all. He's not calling them "Behike" and the bands look nothing like the Behike bands.
Are all Lanceros a rip-off of the Cohiba Lancero? Are all Churchills a rip-off of the R&J Churchill? Copying, sure, but a rip-off? Come on, guys, let's not make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Tatuaje has been paying homage to Cuban heritage brands since it's inception. Just look at the first line, the Brown label, each vitola named after classic Cuban cigars:
Noella (5 1/8 x 42)
Regio (5 1/2 x 50)
Unicos (6 1/8 x 52)
Havana Cazadore (6 3/8 x 43)
Especiale (7 1/2 x 38)
Taino (7 5/8 x 49)
Reserva SW (i.e. Sir Winston)
How can this be a bad thing? Cigars were born in Cuba, and will always have ties to Cuba. Most NC manufacturers pay homage to Cuba in some way, at least via Spanish names, etc. This is completely normal and I honestly am astounded by the annoyance some people seem to be displaying.
As to the Andre thing ... Pete is saying "I'm copying the Behike sizes here." It's intended, obvious, and stated. What Andre did here and there was never stated as "copying Tatuaje," and that's what rubbed some people the wrong way