What's new

Bolivar vs Bolivar....?

Rating - 100%
8   0   0
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
1,791
Location
Philadelphia
Good day to all my good people.,

Just a little clarification. I do know this, when I hear Bolivar only one came to mind *Cuban Cigar* until now. I now know do to a recent thread that Cohiba *Cuban* and Cohiba * red dots* are not the same. So whats the gimick on the Boli's same as in the Cohiba. I did see that the Latter Bolivar scored about a 90 rating as did the latter Cohiba? Whats with this, is this common practice to sponge off of another companies successful line to sell cigars?
Hope all is well with everyone, Have a great day!
 

Attachments

Rating - 100%
234   0   0
Joined
Jan 9, 2006
Messages
9,446
Location
Mid-Atlantic
The non Cuban ones took the names of the Cuban brands that were already existing. Thanks to the USA for this, they don't acknowledge the Cuban brands here so others took them for their own.
 
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
783
Location
Long Island, NY
The non Cuban ones took the names of the Cuban brands that were already existing. Thanks to the USA for this, they don't acknowledge the Cuban brands here so others took them for their own.
Yep basically they stole the US trademarks to the names since our govt won't recognize the Cubans trademarks.
 
Rating - 100%
234   0   0
Joined
Jan 9, 2006
Messages
9,446
Location
Mid-Atlantic
Here is a good read on this subject.

http://cigarworlds.com/cuban-cigars.html




Another find reguarding the Cohiba brand:

http://cohibas.com/

December 14, 2009

New York District Judge Robert Sweet ruled on December 14, 2009 that the Cohiba brand belonged to Cubatabaco and that US based General Cigar can no longer use the Cohiba name for its cigars made in the Dominican Republic. Since 1992 General Cigar used the Cohiba brand, originally started in Cuba and owned by state run Cubatabaco, to market their own Cohiba cigars.

The Cohiba brand is sold in every country except the United States because of the long standing US Embargo against Cuba.

General Cigar’s representatives said they’ll appeal the judge's ruling in this case that has been in the courts for ten years. However, General Cigar is allowed to continue selling Dominican Republic Cohibas until the appeal is heard.

The lawyers for Cubatabaco say that this decision "vindicates the fundamental principle that a company cannot be permitted to reap what it has not sowed and that it cannot exploit the goodwill and reputation of another enterprise’s product".

The website Cohibas.com has been covering this trademark and brand dispute for several years.
 

dpricenator

BoM March 08
Rating - 100%
175   0   3
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
14,899
Location
The OC
The non Cuban ones took the names of the Cuban brands that were already existing. Thanks to the USA for this, they don't acknowledge the Cuban brands here so others took them for their own.
This is one way to say it.

Another way is:

When the Cuban Government came in and stole the businesses of hard working Cuban cigar makers. Those people left Cuba and began their companies elsewhere. Then Altadis and General may have bought those name from the original farmers. Also now, Altadis owns a good portion of Habanos S.A. so they use/plagiarize Cuban cigar names and styles all the time.
 

gibbleguts

BoM april 09
Rating - 100%
166   0   0
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
3,224
Location
Wouldn't you like to know?
This is one way to say it.

Another way is:

When the Cuban Government came in and stole the businesses of hard working Cuban cigar makers. Those people left Cuba and began their companies elsewhere. Then Altadis and General may have bought those name from the original farmers. Also now, Altadis owns a good portion of Habanos S.A. so they use/plagiarize Cuban cigar names and styles all the time.
That may be true for some of the products but both cohiba and Trinidad were released well after the embargo was in place and both are now in use by non cuban manufacturers. They may be able to claim that trinidad was an old brand they revived but they only did such to capitalize on the name and prestige created by cuba.
 
Rating - 90%
9   1   0
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
1,689
Location
Dallas, TX
When the Cuban Government came in and stole the businesses of hard working Cuban cigar makers. Those people left Cuba and began their companies elsewhere. Then Altadis and General may have bought those name from the original farmers. Also now, Altadis owns a good portion of Habanos S.A. so they use/plagiarize Cuban cigar names and styles all the time.
:thumbsup:
 
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Messages
1,032
Location
Massachusetts
It isn't always trying to leech off another companies name. Most of these Cuban companies were sieges by the Cuban government during the revolution, and the families who founded the company fled to different regions like Nicaragua, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, etc. So in a way I guess you could say they are leeching off their own success?

When someone wrote an article evaluating the different Cuban and Domestic cigar brands, only 2 brands were blatantly copied. Most of them were made by the original makers of the Cuban brands after their brands were either stolen by the government or because they wanted to expand to the U.S. market.
 
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
1,791
Location
Philadelphia
So what does all this have to do with Quality, is the Cuban bolivar anything like it's Us counterpart? I know it rated in the 90's, but has anyone tried these?
Appreciate the feedback fellas, Thanks
 
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
783
Location
Long Island, NY
So what does all this have to do with Quality, is the Cuban bolivar anything like it's Us counterpart? I know it rated in the 90's, but has anyone tried these?
Appreciate the feedback fellas, Thanks
Not even close. The Cubans have a depth of flavor the NC's don't touch.
 
Top