What's new

The Great RH Experiment

Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
281
Location
Black Hills of South Dakota
Here's one of the GreatValudors all stocked with slected sticks. Dang candela is already off to a bad start, just keep swimming, just keep swimming....

Here's all the test subjects with their appropriate RH level Bovedas.


So, that's about all the excitement I have for a while. It will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out.
BTW, is anyone else having issues with the Photobucket app for Android crashing constantly?
 
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
281
Location
Black Hills of South Dakota
Looking back at my post, I really haven't done the Caldwell wrappers justice! What great looking sticks. It's been quite the challenge to not smoke every last one today. And the Fuentes, why the heck do I almost always seem to see random globs of cigar glue all over them? I don't think it has any effect on the burn or taste, but for reals guys, why the extra glue all the time! Speaking of wrappers, darn those fragile candelas!
 
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
281
Location
Black Hills of South Dakota
Sorry for the huge gap in communication! I'm back with an update.
I've had time to smoke through the majority of the sticks in the 62 and 72 percent, and have found some constants.
First of, a few surprises, well to me at least. After plenty of time to acclimate, and comparing the same selections to each other, I found it impossible to tell simply by look at what stick was at what percent. Even putting the extremes next to each other there was no visible evidence as to the humidity. I guess I've read a lot about guys seeing a "dull" wrapper and immediately knowing it was 3% drier than they prefer. Maybe it's just me. Second, there was almost zero difference in the feel of the sticks. I say almost because the only place I could feel anything was when giving a squeeze at the absolute very tippy top of the foot. As to be expected, the higher the RH, the "squishier" the feel. There was a difference, but not a huge one. If I was given a selection of sticks with no hint how they were stored I'd probably chalk it up to variances from stick to stick. Finally, and I wasn't really out to compare this, without exception the higher the HR, the stronger the smell from the unit cigar. The final pre-smoke observation was that I did end up spotting a tiny patch of mold in the 72% GreatValuedor during a weekly inspection. It was on the Short Story, right in the middle of an excess smear of glue. The offending cigar was promptly burned as not to contaminate the others.
On to the taste. I might put up my full tasting notes at some point, but I found some consistencies that I will post here. The 72% sticks started with very bold flavors in the earthier, darker, even chocolate ranges. No stick was given flavors I hadn't detected before, but they were much more pronounced. For example, the Short Story started with a hugely dominant cocoa flavor. The sweetness picked up a little later on, but never really "mixed" with the cocoa. The 62% RH sticks saw a more subtle and more blended flavor profile. As expected, the smoke also felt very dry. Oddly enough, and again very consistently, the half way points saw an abrupt change. The 62% sticks turned to nothing more than hot air, not even a generic tobacco smoke flavor. The 72% sticks turned bitter, very bitter, but not all of them were an unpleasant bitter to me. I do tend to enjoy that side of the flavor wheel though.
Now for the burn. The drier the stick, the shorter the burn time, not really a huge surprise there. I'll default to the Short Story again, 72% lasted me 1 hour and 24 minutes, while the 62% sample went only 1 hour and 5 minutes. I did note that I felt like I was puffing a little faster on the higher humidity cigars to ensure they stayed light. I stopped them pretty darn close to the same amount remaining. The burn line was very consistent between the same sticks and the different RH storage levels. Another unexpected observation was there was virtually no difference in the amount of time it took me to do my usual toasting rituals. I expected that higher RH would result in needing a longer toast to properly (for me) light.
So there you have it so far. I'm certainly surprised by a few things, maybe you weren't, but there you go. As I have the time I'll put up some more detailed and cigar specific notes with the 69 and 65 percent, as I think we were all betting that the 72 and 62 would not end up being a winning RH storage option.
 
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
1,792
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Sorry for the huge gap in communication! I'm back with an update.
I've had time to smoke through the majority of the sticks in the 62 and 72 percent, and have found some constants.
First of, a few surprises, well to me at least. After plenty of time to acclimate, and comparing the same selections to each other, I found it impossible to tell simply by look at what stick was at what percent. Even putting the extremes next to each other there was no visible evidence as to the humidity. I guess I've read a lot about guys seeing a "dull" wrapper and immediately knowing it was 3% drier than they prefer. Maybe it's just me. Second, there was almost zero difference in the feel of the sticks. I say almost because the only place I could feel anything was when giving a squeeze at the absolute very tippy top of the foot. As to be expected, the higher the RH, the "squishier" the feel. There was a difference, but not a huge one. If I was given a selection of sticks with no hint how they were stored I'd probably chalk it up to variances from stick to stick. Finally, and I wasn't really out to compare this, without exception the higher the HR, the stronger the smell from the unit cigar. The final pre-smoke observation was that I did end up spotting a tiny patch of mold in the 72% GreatValuedor during a weekly inspection. It was on the Short Story, right in the middle of an excess smear of glue. The offending cigar was promptly burned as not to contaminate the others.
On to the taste. I might put up my full tasting notes at some point, but I found some consistencies that I will post here. The 72% sticks started with very bold flavors in the earthier, darker, even chocolate ranges. No stick was given flavors I hadn't detected before, but they were much more pronounced. For example, the Short Story started with a hugely dominant cocoa flavor. The sweetness picked up a little later on, but never really "mixed" with the cocoa. The 62% RH sticks saw a more subtle and more blended flavor profile. As expected, the smoke also felt very dry. Oddly enough, and again very consistently, the half way points saw an abrupt change. The 62% sticks turned to nothing more than hot air, not even a generic tobacco smoke flavor. The 72% sticks turned bitter, very bitter, but not all of them were an unpleasant bitter to me. I do tend to enjoy that side of the flavor wheel though.
Now for the burn. The drier the stick, the shorter the burn time, not really a huge surprise there. I'll default to the Short Story again, 72% lasted me 1 hour and 24 minutes, while the 62% sample went only 1 hour and 5 minutes. I did note that I felt like I was puffing a little faster on the higher humidity cigars to ensure they stayed light. I stopped them pretty darn close to the same amount remaining. The burn line was very consistent between the same sticks and the different RH storage levels. Another unexpected observation was there was virtually no difference in the amount of time it took me to do my usual toasting rituals. I expected that higher RH would result in needing a longer toast to properly (for me) light.
So there you have it so far. I'm certainly surprised by a few things, maybe you weren't, but there you go. As I have the time I'll put up some more detailed and cigar specific notes with the 69 and 65 percent, as I think we were all betting that the 72 and 62 would not end up being a winning RH storage option.
This is awesome. Thanks for taking the time and energy to do this study. I have heard from a tobacconist friend of mine, that once the cigars get below 70% they start losing those essential oils that account for many of the flavor in the cigars we all share and love. That would make sense given in your study, you saw a change in the strength of flavors between the RH levels. Thanks for sharing!!
 

Tobacco Giant

Conn. Broadleaf Slayer
Rating - 100%
32   0   0
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
1,088
Location
Philadelphia
Great, great stuff. Thank you for taking the time!

This actually reminds me. I set out to do something similar several years ago with respect to temperature. Back in 2012 I purchased 4 Padron maduros and put 2 in a ziplock with a 69% boveda and threw it in the fridge. I put 2 in a ziplock with a 69% boveda and threw it in my wineador. I never actually went back and smoked them, so they've just sat there aging for 3 years, haha. I should pull them out and do a little experiment soon.
 

Cigary43

Just Another Ashhole
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
3,742
Location
San Diego/Atlanta
I did this years ago with the same basic set up of different humidors with test subject of cigars I knew very well so I could make a strong case of changing profiles at the different RH levels. I had as many as 5 humidors ( tupperware ) that were at 62%, 64, 66, 68 and 70% and the temps at 70 degrees F. 6 months left me with some very real information that changed my thoughts as I wanted to give enough time ( 6 months ) for this experiment to be valid. RH is a valuable component as far as taste and profile and balance is concerned and it does change the cigar. I also tried to keep each cigar in one vitola...toro sized so that the experiment didn't have to acknowledge a different sized cigar...different sizes can alter the profile...RG, filler/binder/wrapper.

The natural oils of our cigars as I found out is not a misnomer when you really get into the experiment with lower RH...once the oils tend to dry out at lower RH they aren't coming back so that tends to skew the over profile of the cigar. Another factor I thought was going to really cause issues was the higher %...at 70% to be exact. When I took the first cigar out and smoked it I experienced some burn issues which I was expecting but then decided to put the next test cigar into a dry box for 3 days and then smoke it...what a difference! No burn issues....the taste was exactly like the previous cigar only I didn't have to deal with any other factors and it was a richer taste...more balanced...retrohale was so easy and found myself smelling the aroma more than I usually do.

This had me thinking that maybe I should store all of my cigars at 70%RH....I was quickly brought back to reality when I smoked my next cigar that had a thinner wrapper...a natural and no matter what I did with this cigar...dry boxing...didn't help it as the burn issues returned and stayed. 70% RH was a number reserved for wrappers that were hearty enough to keep the cigar from becoming a veritable washcloth and I now keep thin wrappers at 65%...no higher.

The last component of experiments like this is individual tastes have to be a major part of your findings because ....taste matters. Expectations are also a matter of this experiment as to satisfaction...it isn't going to change a cheap cigar into a premium and at the very least you need to use cigars that are at least of good quality tobacco to start with.
 
Top