SpartanFan - "Reviews" are really just one party's opinion--they're not necessarily right OR wrong.
That said, I do take issue (and I won't mention specific blog/review sites) when a premium cigar is given a '70-something' rating. Sometimes I think certain review sites are going overboard on the whole "Hey, we call em like we see em--we're just so honest--we're different than Cigar Aficionado--blah, blah, blah" thing. After 17 years of working in this business, I find it very difficult to fathom that a premium, handmade cigar that is brought to market can be SO inferior as to receive a sub-80 point review. I've seen and know firsthand what goes into the creation of a blend/cigar, and I can't imagine a cigar-maker worth his salt, and with decades of experience in tobaccos would bring something to market that is just so 'God-awful' as some of these reviewers would have you believe.
It's very easy to be opinionated and brave when you're sitting behind a keyboard. One of my favorite quotes about 'critics' is:
"Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done everyday, but they're unable to do it themselves."
Ultimately, it comes down to this: Smoke what you like, regardless of what some so-called 'expert palate' says.
Jon Huber
Crowned Heads
I feel the opposite. The lack of scores below 80 skews results and the scale to a high degree. A 70 would mean average, and so it is an average cigar with perhaps one major redeeming factor. Below that? Well those would be poorly constructed, tastes that don't align well, flavors that can't be detected or perhaps even enjoyed. Beyond that? Well in my opinion those would be anything from Alec Bradley. They taste like meat and salt and I will likely never try another of theirs unless I was given it and asked to by another. My reasoning is that the flavors are reprehensible, though it saves itself for being an actual cigar built decently. Beyond that? I imagine something else is there.
But instead, all I ever see is 80's for the most part unless it's an overhyped limited edition I'll likely never have the chance to try. Then they rate it terribly for some strange reason.
Cigars seem to mirror how games work... If it has multiplayer it gets a seven, and if lot's of people played the previous it gets an 8, anything beyond is paid for. I can't trust game reviewers because of such obstruction of the scale. I guess I can't trust cigar reviewers either then.